CBS’s Bari Weiss Kills 60 Minutes CECOT Prison Story, Sparking Staff Revolt and Censorship Accusations

cbs news censorship trump CECOT

CBS News is engulfed in an internal firestorm after Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss pulled a fully vetted 60 Minutes investigation into El Salvador’s notorious CECOT prison just hours before it was scheduled to air on Sunday.

The decision has triggered staff threats to quit, accusations of political censorship, and serious questions about the network’s editorial independence under its new leadership.

The segment, titled “Inside CECOT,” featured correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi interviewing Venezuelan migrants deported by the Trump administration to the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo, a maximum-security facility that has become infamous for allegations of torture and brutal conditions. According to an internal email obtained by multiple news outlets, Alfonsi learned Saturday that Weiss spiked the story, despite it having cleared every editorial hurdle imaginable.

Five Screenings, Full Legal Clearance, Then a Last-Minute Kill

The timeline of what happened reads like a case study in editorial interference. CBS’s publicity team had already sent out press releases Friday morning promoting the segment. The network ran video promotions on air and across social media platforms. The story had been screened five times and cleared by both CBS attorneys and Standards and Practices. Everything was ready to go.

Then Weiss weighed in on Saturday morning with a list of concerns. Her primary objection: the Trump administration had not provided an on-the-record comment or interview. At one point, Weiss reportedly provided White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller’s contact information directly to the 60 Minutes team, suggesting they secure an interview with him or another senior administration official.

But here’s the thing that makes this particularly troubling: Alfonsi and her team had already reached out to the Department of Homeland Security, the White House, and the State Department requesting interviews and comments. The administration declined to engage. In her blistering internal memo, Alfonsi argued that allowing government silence to become an effective veto over critical journalism sets a dangerous precedent.

“If the administration’s refusal to participate becomes a valid reason to spike a story, we have effectively handed them a ‘kill switch’ for any reporting they find inconvenient,” Alfonsi wrote.

The “Venezuelan Migrants” vs “Illegal Immigrants” Dispute

Weiss also reportedly objected to the terminology used in the segment. She questioned why the men were described as “Venezuelan migrants” rather than “illegal immigrants,” a term preferred by the Trump administration. This linguistic dispute cuts to the heart of how immigration stories get framed, and Weiss’s preference for the administration’s language raised eyebrows.

The facts on the ground complicate the “illegal immigrant” framing considerably. According to the National Immigration Law Center, many of those sent to CECOT were not in the United States illegally. They had applied for asylum and were awaiting decisions on their applications when they were deported. The U.S. government sent more than 280 young men to CECOT in March and April 2025, often in secret, with no notice to their families or attorneys. Four months later, 252 of them were released and sent to Venezuela, a country many had originally fled fearing persecution.

Staff Threatening to Walk

The fallout inside CBS has been severe. CNN’s chief media analyst Brian Stelter reported Sunday night that “people are threatening to quit over this” within the 60 Minutes newsroom, where journalistic independence has traditionally been considered sacrosanct.

Alfonsi’s internal email to colleagues didn’t mince words. “Our story was screened five times and cleared by both CBS attorneys and Standards and Practices. It is factually correct. In my view, pulling it now, after every rigorous internal check has been met, is not an editorial decision, it is a political one.”

She also emphasized the ethical obligations to sources who took significant personal risks to share their experiences. “These men risked their lives to speak with us. We have a moral and professional obligation to the sources who entrusted us with their stories. Abandoning them now is a betrayal of the most basic tenet of journalism: giving voice to the voiceless.”

The Skydance Connection and Trump’s Recent Complaints

The timing of Weiss’s appointment and this editorial intervention raises questions about corporate motives. Weiss joined CBS News in October when David Ellison’s Skydance Media acquired her contrarian outlet, The Free Press, in a deal reportedly worth $150 million. She was simultaneously named CBS News Editor-in-Chief, her first role in television news.

Industry observers speculated at the time that Weiss’s appointment was intended to improve CBS News’s standing with Trump and the MAGA movement. That theory gained considerable traction Sunday night.

Just weeks ago, Trump publicly slammed 60 Minutes, complaining the show was treating him even worse since CBS’s parent company was acquired. That complaint came after correspondent Lesley Stahl’s December 7 interview with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a one-time Trump supporter who has recently been critical of the president on several issues.

The corporate entanglements get even more complicated. Paramount Skydance has launched a hostile takeover bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, the parent company of CNN. Any perception that Skydance’s media properties are willing to defer to the Trump administration could theoretically smooth regulatory paths for such acquisitions.

Weiss’s Defense and What Comes Next

Weiss told The New York Times that “holding stories that aren’t ready for whatever reason, that they lack sufficient context, say, or that they are missing critical voices, happens every day in every newsroom.” She added that she “looks forward to airing this important piece when it’s ready.”

A CBS News spokesperson echoed that position, saying the segment “needed additional reporting” and would air in a future broadcast. The network has not provided a new air date.

But that explanation has satisfied virtually no one. Critics, including Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Glenn Greenwald, have been scathing. “It’s almost impressive how much damage Bari Weiss has done to CBS News in such a short period of time,” Greenwald posted on X alongside the now-deleted trailer for the CECOT segment.

The Bigger Picture: When Government Silence Becomes a Kill Switch

The most troubling aspect of this episode isn’t the specific editorial decision, it’s the precedent it potentially establishes. If fully vetted, legally cleared investigative journalism can be spiked because an administration simply refuses to comment, then every future administration has a roadmap for avoiding accountability.

Investigative journalism has always required reaching out for comment. But the failure to secure that comment has never been grounds for killing a story that meets every other editorial and legal standard. The alternative would mean that any subject of critical reporting could simply stay silent and watch the story disappear.

What happened at CBS this weekend represents something more insidious than simple editorial disagreement. It suggests a network willing to let government preferences dictate coverage, at least when the government in question has powerful allies in the corporate parent’s executive suite.

The men who spoke to Sharyn Alfonsi about CECOT took real risks to tell their stories. The question now is whether CBS will honor that trust, or whether Sunday’s episode marks a new era in which “editorial standards” become a convenient excuse for political deference.

Sources

  • NPR: “CBS News chief Bari Weiss pulls ’60 Minutes’ story, sparking outcry”
  • CNN: “CBS shelves ’60 Minutes’ story on Trump deportees at the last minute”
  • The Washington Post: “’60 Minutes’ correspondent says CBS’s Bari Weiss abruptly pulled segment”
  • Variety: “Bari Weiss Pulls ’60 Minutes’ Segment on Trump White House CECOT Prison”
  • Axios: “’60 Minutes’ yanks segment, prompting concerns around editorial independence”
  • The Daily Beast: “CBS’s ’60 Minutes’ Staff Threaten to Walk After Bari Weiss Kills Major Donald Trump Story”